Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
HH:
How can a risk ratio be anything other than a measure of relative risk?
What is the "vehicularly" you speak of when talking about riding on a sidepath?
Why would you even think of riding recklessly on a sidepath to bolster a point of relative risk?
I'm tired of answering your questions while you continue to dodge mine.
From yesterday (post
#140), copied here with some additional context:
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
...
The only posts I've seen that are analysis of Forester's writings in this thread are those from invisiblehand.
So put up your own thread. Or put up stuff which counters the ill-repute Forester has on this forum. Do SOMETHING besides complain.
(and I've seen good stuff from ILTB, Chipcom, sbhikes, as well as invisiblehand and Speedo - and others, of course. Just because you don't agree doesn't make it invalid. You're just some guy...)
Please identify the post numbers of, or better yet copy/paste, the "good stuff" from ILTB, Chipcom or sbhikes in this thread that you consider to be critical analysis of something that Forester has actually written, that reflects a genuine attempt to understand what Forester meant, and you believe qualifies as a debunking of a Forester position on an issue of significance to bicycling advocacy or safety.
And citing something like Diane's #171, which I do think was pretty good analysis, that was posted
after you made your claim in #129 that you've seen "good stuff" from ILTB, etc., does not count.
Also, note that I did "do SOMETHING besides complain", in post
#143, to which you never responded either.
From today:
What specific conclusion do you think Forester reached from this experiment, using his actual words and a genuine effort to understand what he meant in the context in which they were written, that you think is not supported by the experiment?
Maybe you just didn't see them. Anyway, please answer those questions (in red) honestly and genuinely, then I'll be happy to get to yours. Fair enough?