Originally Posted by chipcom
I'm getting really tired of hearing this horsecrap.
Having been a member here since september of 2005, you must know that you can put HH, and/or any other members, on your "ignore list." Then, you wouldn't have to "hear" what you consider "horsecrap."
Originally Posted by chipcom
Personal responsibility is one thing, but shoulda, woulda, coulda by Monday morning quarterbacks is about as valid concerning cycling as it is for football games.
As you probably know, people who play and coach those games spend many hours reviewing recordings, precisely for the purpose of doing it better "next time." Review of cycling incidents and situations, by cyclists, does, indeed, seem "about as valid" as that -- which is to say *very* valid.
Originally Posted by chipcom
This is the same kind of thinking that says **** victims had it coming due to their own actions or inaction, and it sickens me.
This is a ridiculous, and deliberately inflammatory, analogy, Chip. Given the evidence provided by many of your other posts, it seems clear that you are bright enough to actually argue the fact and theory relevant to your position. Why do you so often resort to angry mudslinging like this?
Originally Posted by chipcom
...despite what Mr. Only-seen-the-world-in-books says...
How much time, in the year and a half you have been posting here, have you spent inventing derogatory names for HH (and perhaps others)? Do you actually believe that this sort of offensive behavior somehow bolsters your arguments? I assure you that it does not, except, perhaps, with the amen chorus of followers who seem ever-ready to join you in heaping ridicule on those you've designated as your victims.
In short, you're behaving like a bully, Chip. It's not attractive and it's not impressive. I really don't understand why the operators of the forum put up with this nonsense.