Originally Posted by kaliergo the VC
I do not support, indeed, I actively oppose, the creation and mandated use of segregated facilities which are purported to be for the benefit of cyclists but which are in fact intended to get cyclists out of the way of motorists. I am dismayed that so many cyclists have been duped into believing that these "facilities" enhance their safety and I often try to explain what I believe to be the truth of the matter.
yep, like I said....VC oppose the use of bike facilties. mandatory use IS something worth fighting against. Maybe the VC consider "as far right as practicable EXCEPT" language mandatory use laws.
And bike infrastructure has been PROVEN, in cities AROUND THE GLOBE, to BOTH: 1) increase cyclists and 2) increase cyclist safety. There's no dupe, except in your slant against bike infrastructure, kalirego.