Thread: 165 v 175
View Single Post
Old 03-15-07 | 05:12 PM
  #14  
Ken Cox
King of the Hipsters
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 2
From: Bend, Oregon

Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom

Originally Posted by zacked
Please assimilate this advice as you would any from a stranger on the internet.
Why does the truth make me laugh?

Huh?

=====

A friend has a very nice fixie conversion.

He got pedal strike with 175mm cranks.

A frame designed for fixed gear has a much higher bottom bracket, and this reduces the probability of pedal strike almost to zero.

Let's see.

Yesterday, Pi Day.

3/14

What did we learn from Pi Day?

A 175mm crank has a diameter of 350mm and a 165mm crank has a diameter of 330mm (did that in my head...better check it).

350 X 3.141592 equals a larger number than 330 X 3.141592.

What else?

Distance equals Time times Rate.

D = TR.

In one case, the pedal and the foot on the pedal must travel 350 X 3.141592 every time the crank goes around, and, in the other case, the pedal and the foot on the pedal must travel 330 X 3.141592 every time the crank goes around.

If the crank must go around in its circle 120 times in a minute in order for the bicycle to go as fast as the rider wants it to go, how much further will the foot on the 175mm crank travel in a minute than will the foot on a 165mm crank in the same minute?

Or, given that the foot on the pedal can only travel so far in a minute, how many more revolutions per minute would a 165mm crank make, for the same foot speed, than would a 175mm crank?
Ken Cox is offline  
Reply