Originally Posted by BostonFixed
Longer cranks make hill climbing easier at the expense of easier spinning on the flats.
summed up the whole thread right here. that's the biggest thing i've noticed. i went from 175 to 170 and haven't noticed much, but when i'd go from 175 to 165 on my friend's bike, it'd be a fairly noticeable difference. i'm happy with the 170 right now though it is true at higher cadences, a smaller arm could but a little more comfortable, but i definitely like the leverage for hills.
if my city were flat though, there'd be no question about going 165 or even 160 if i could find it.