View Single Post
Old 03-17-07 | 08:46 PM
  #24  
deathhare's Avatar
deathhare
:jarckass:
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,562
Likes: 1
From: Nashville
Originally Posted by dutret
NO with the exception of mtbs and comfort bikes that need to be stood over the vast majority of serious cyclists will tell you that ST length is meaningless and bikes are better sized with tt length(provided you can actually get the seat at the right height.)

You disagreed with most everyone else on the thread who was telling him that he should ignore ST and look at TT. Your -1 is disagreement and then said that in fact st to tt ratio is somehow meaningful. This is complete and total nonsense. Further, since the purpose of the thread was to give the OP advice your moronic babbling is indeed advice even if bad advice. I know you've bought a some track bikes in the past few months including some that didn't fit you but you're in over your head here.
Clearly, totally ignoring seattube length is stupid. Thats all i meant by it. I think even you would agree that totally ignoring it is dumb and im sure you wouldnt do such a thing.> Ive seen frames with 56cm top tubes and 50cm seat tubes. I dont know about you..but i wouldnt ride that. If nothing else, it just look bad.
deathhare is offline  
Reply