View Single Post
Old 03-18-07, 09:23 AM
  #10  
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
these 'advanced' definitions seem to be a bit loose and contrary to the basic rules.

* Using negotiation to create gaps. okay.

* Merging left one lane at a time.okay.

* Signaling using look backs. VERY QUESTIONABLE. it works because it creates a vision of cyclist uncertainity, NOT A clear signal. a clear signal is the "POINT AND SHOOT" or the "I'm going THERE" finger.

* Being able to look back for more than a fraction of a second without riding off course. questionable. that's a definition????

* Using assertive "centerish" lane positioning to discourage lane sharing/squeezing when the lane is too narrow to be safely shared.agreed- technique.

* Using assertive "centerish" lane positioning to improve sight lines and conspicuity when safe and reasonable to do so. DISAGREE. an advanced vehicular cyclist only needs to use a centerish position when necessaary, and it is NOT the default position. contrary to 'rotr.'

* Recognizing when traffic behind needs a hint about what to do, and providing it appropriately and effectively. technique.

* Recognizing when and where bike lanes are okay to use, and when they should be avoided.agree.

* Etc. that's loose.

Last edited by Bekologist; 03-18-07 at 05:40 PM.
Bekologist is offline