Originally Posted by Helmet Head
I disagree, because none of his important conclusions about vehicular cycling actually require a unique "Scientific process" in order to be supported.
Dat's funny. Forester's recently posted criticism of the Dutch "bikeway system" designers was all about their
failure to address
his questions/interpretations of an appropriate (IAW Forester) "scientific basis" supporting their design.
And I have to agree in one sense, you've shown a willingness to "support" conclusions about your own unique cycling technique (DLLP/Power Weaving/Alpha dawg staring, steely eyed gazes, pedal dancing, etc) regardless of no process but conjuring.