Originally Posted by JeffS
Why does everyone insist on using MTB or BMX analogies to measure agility. It's an irrelevant comparison. Whether I agree with the point or not, the comparison is still irrelevant.
The word agility as applied to mountain and road riding has entirely different meanings. Until you can find an arugment not centered around a dirt analogy you've made no point.
Why? How is it a different standard of agility? I am not trying to be confrontational, I am just genuinely curious.