View Single Post
03-28-07, 10:20 AM
#25
mander
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Van BC
Posts: 3,744
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dirtyphotons
http://sheldonbrown.com/fixed.html#skid

edit: if the theorem above is correct, and it looks like it is, the sentence should read:

If you are an ambidextrous skidder, and the simplified ratio has an even numerator, your number of skid patches will be the same.

If you are an ambidextrous skidder, and the numerator and denominator is odd, the number of possible skid patches will be doubled.

to be fair, i was the one who called sheldon out on this originally, and being the reasonable person he is, he changed his site to reflect it. turns out we were both wrong
Look here, according to Fraction the denominator doesn't have to be odd. Only the numerator matters. I just want to get clear on this because everyone's website says a different thing and Fraction's result is backed up by his proof (which looks OK to me, but ought to be checked by someone better at math) as well as Rabbit's brute force algorithm.

Originally Posted by fraction
Let a / b be the reduced gear ratio (that is, a and b are integers with no common divisors other than 1). Then,
...
(2) Ambidexterous skidding doubles the number of skid patches if and only if a is odd.