View Single Post
Old 04-20-07 | 02:08 PM
  #4  
cyccommute's Avatar
cyccommute
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,155
Likes: 6,213
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by davidmcowan
I've avoided looking at touring bikes because I've heard their gearing is too easy for regular riding around. I ride fixed most of the time and have a fairly strong, smooth stroke as a result and I find myself spinning out when riding bikes of this gearing (and hardly utilizing the bottom two cogs). Would you suggest touring bikes still? I can't figure out why I've fallen in love with the idea of a surly but it probably has something to do with this forum. How different are the CC and the LHT anyway? What other steel, mucho clearance for fenders and different wheels/ and rack brazons up the wazoo bikes are worth consideration?
The LHT comes with a 48/11 high which is a 117" gear as does the Cross Check. It'd be easy enough to swap out the Sugino for a normal road bike crank (Talk to me later, I might even have 1...or 2...or 3 ). My commuter bike had a 52/40/30 triple paired with an 11-34 which give a range of from 127 to 31 but I hardly ever used the 127" gear. A 117" is still pretty tall.

The LHT is a touring bike so it's got a longer chainstay to move the load back and still keep it within the wheels. This slows its handling down a little but makes it a more stable ride. It's frame is a beefed up a bit to handle the task of hauling heavy loads over long distances. With a longer wheelbase it's a more forgiving ride too. It has 3 water bottle braze-ons rather than 2 and a mid fork braze-on for mounting a rack on the front (not too important for commuting but it is for touring). The wheels are tougher - and heavier - and the tires are a bit wider which makes for a more comfortable ride on rough roads. It could probably take something even wider than a 35 (like a 41) if you want to really float over stuff.

Other bikes to consider are the Bianchi Volpe (Turin) which is a cross bike. The Fuji Touring (Cycle Analyst and Turin) which is a touring bike with a bit shorter wheel base than the LHT. The Randonee at REI which is similar to the Fuji. The Jamis Nova (cross) or Aurora (short touring) at Salvagetti's on Speer. A little further up the price range would be a Trek 520.

All of these bikes - except the Randonee - come with a 52/11 high gear. If I were to personally rank them as commuter bikes without wanting to do unsupported touring on them, I'd go

1. Aurora
2. Trek 520
3. LHT
4. Fuji
5. Nova
6. Randonee
7. Volpe
8. Cross Check

The LHT, 520, Aurora and Fuji are kind of a toss up. If you ever thought of loading the bike up with gear and hitting the open road, the LHT wins hands down.

The other's on the list aren't bad bikes and they would all be worth throwing a leg over and taking a ride. They are all in the $900 to $1000 price range, except the Trek which goes for closer to $1200.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply