No you can not have it both ways! Your hypocricy slip is showing. If you believe the CO2 is the doom's day precursor than you must sacrifice everything to halt the process.
Chalk this one up for TAWL
As you freely admit that we are the #1 producer of CO2, and TAWL inherently causes this, you must than give up TAWL completely. We all know the use of fossil fuel is the #1 culprit of increasing [CO2], will you then propose the cessation of fossil fuel? Or slowly ease into the usage of alternative energy with the economic and geo politics of fossil fuel <sic> petroleum, <sic> crude oil, <sic> gulf states as guidance. Scary eh! For your conscience's sake. let's
Chalk this one as neutral for TAWL.
Being a capitalist as your last statement suggest if you have the right idea you could make a fortune, then the idea of promoting global warming to profit financially is outright opportunistic. Brother,
Chalk this one up for TAWL
It may seems that way at first glance, if you will not take the impact of deforestation, overpopulation, warfare, poverty etc into consideration. We may be producer of the major quantity of CO2. However if you factor efficiency, and productivity into the equation that will really make your argument moot. One produce as much waste working or not working.
Neutral for this one on TAWL?
Not applicable to TAWL? Sure reflect the restraint consistent with TAWL to me.
.
Make sure you are absolutely certain that the reseach paper you read PERSONALLY are legitimate. At least the abstact of the reseach paper that you have read. Giving you all the benefits of doubt
Chalk this one down for TAWL.
So we have
2 for, 1 against and 2 neutral on TAWL & 1 N/A OUI, NONE?
There is still hope
