Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
USADA: "We want to clean up the sport. We can do it with your help. If you can give us evidence to catch others we can lighten your punishement. Do you have any evidence Armstrong used PED's?"
We don't know if that's exactly how they said it (if they said anything) Because Landis is throwing Mud and then hiding behind a Gag rule.
However, assume it went down along the lines I outlined above; this would be slimy?
If it were phrased like you have it above, then yes, it would be slimy. One, while they can offer this type of plea bargain, they are
not allowed to ask about individual athletes. Two, what are you going to prove by going after Lance now? How badly do you want to hurt cycling in the USA? He's retired - whether he used PED's in the sport or not, he's not going to any more, so move on.