I'm asking you to make an educated guess. I'm asking you to use your head. What sort of relationship do you imagine there is between income, social status, education level attainment and internet access? What about relationships between income levels, social status, education level attainment and some of the more dangerous cycling behaviors, like wrong-way cycling, and unlit riding at night?

http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/PED_BIKE/...3p00324/01.htm

http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Lati...ch_14_2007.pdf

For example, the first article points out that a disproportionate number of hispanic cyclists are killed in the US.
I would assume from your assertion that it is generally the cyclists who are at fault, that you would say that it is likely the same for this group of cyclists.

The second article points out how the internet usages of hispanics in the US is significantly lower then that of non-hispanic whites, and even non-hispanic blacks. So these cyclists, who are being killed more often then the likes of you or me, are also much less likely to be reading your articles.

Do you teach or attend classes, Helmet Head?
If so, what percentage would you say are hispanic? San Diego is 46% white, non-hispanic. How does this compare to class attendance? How many non-high school graduates, or people living below the poverty line do you see at class (irrespective of ethnicity)?

If you are interested in teaching a volunteer class that reaches out to the demographics in our shared city of San Diego that are killed the most disproportionately (and provided you would be willing to teach this as a basic safety/skills class that, focuses most on things like following the traffic law, proper lighting, how to ride predictably, and generally vehicularly, while saving the VC ideology for another occasion), I can help you as a translator and interpreter.