View Single Post
Old 05-24-07, 03:08 PM
  #35  
natelutkjohn
Cheesmonger Extraordinair
 
natelutkjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sggoodri
Between intersections/junctions, that works reasonably well.

But at intersections, destination positioning means that cycling with the corresponding vehicular traffic flow for your destination rather than beside traffic headed to the wrong destination requires leaving the striped curbside area, and cycling in traffic (rather than accross) to merge into the appropriate position.

As the intersection count increases, cycling next to traffic and experiencing more crossing events becomes progressively more hazardous than cycling in traffic. Vehicular cyclists prefer to choose between in and next to based on context without having to operate contrary to pavement markings.
Oh, I get it now, when a bikelane advocate talks about riding in a lane (or next to the cars), its called segregation, but when VC does it, its called choice... I think I finally saw the light!



Advocating for bike lanes does not mean advocating that you MUST ride in the bike lane.
natelutkjohn is offline