View Single Post
Old 07-23-07 | 06:10 AM
  #1  
jonwvara's Avatar
jonwvara
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 924
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record

Mafac badness, true or false?

Why do so many people seem to dislike Mafac brakes? I've seen a number of posts from people who think they're awful, including one recent one where the poster referred to them as "those horrible Mafac Racer brakes," or something. I was wondering because I've had a number of bikes with Mafacs over the years and they always work fine for me. They don't seem to be outstandingly better or worse that the Weinmann center pulls on one of my other bikes, or the Suntour Cyclone sidepulls on another, or even the 1990's Shimano cantilivers on my touring bike. I mean, they stop fine, they're not hard to adjust, and they're obviously durable. I know some people claim that they squeak, but I've never found that to be a problem. In my experience, any brake will squeak if you don't clean the rim from time to time, and the Mafacs don't seem any worse in this respect than any other brake.
What gives? I like to think of myself as an open-minded guy, and I'd be willing to give Mafac-hating a try if someone can tell me why that's a good idea. Maybe it's tied up somehow with a more general distaste for France/things French?
JV
jonwvara is offline  
Reply