View Single Post
Old 07-23-07 | 12:15 PM
  #14  
santiago's Avatar
santiago
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,510
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, QC, Canada

Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C

This thread reminded me about something I've been wondering about. We know from previous discussions that current solid state helmet cameras are not up to par with using a proper camcorder, but at what point will the technology catch up? An example of a camera to avoid is the Oregon Scientific ATC-2000.

What is the criteria or the actual specifications one should be looking for? I am not familiar with all the technical specs these things have but what is it that would make one of these chip-based helmet cams worthwhile? Is it the lens? Is it the lines of resolution? At one point the technology will surpass some magical level that makes them more than "good enough", but what is that line? Is there a unit that's come out that actually meets those specifications?
santiago is offline  
Reply