I'll try leaving this post again, it failed the first time.

Boys and girls look at the 2 photos again of the Dinotte, BLT, and the SuperFlash. Pay attention especially to the 2nd pic showing the tail lights at an angle to simulate off angle visibility-I just noticed the problem too, so don't feel alone.

That 2nd photo must have been made by someone who is extremily interested in making sure Dinotte sells those lights and here's why. Take a look at the pic again and you will notice that the BLT and the SuperFlash are indeed at an angle...however now look at the Dinotte...IT'S FACING STRAIGHT ON INTO THE CAMERA!!! It was not aimed at an angle as the others were!!! This makes the light appear to be brighter when in fact it's not and someone was interested in making it appear brighter. Look again at the angles of the lens and the cases and note how bottom two cases show less detail of their cases on the left side and you can see more of the cases on the right-not so with the Dinotte. Then compare the bottom photo of the Dinotte to the Dinotte on the top photo and both are straight on.

I don't think that the Dinotte is worth over 7 times the cost of the BLT; and according to the pics your only gaining about 10% in brightness with the Dinotte.

And don't give me a bunch of crap about going to the hospital if we own a dimmer light because THAT'S A BUNCH CRAP!!!! I've been riding for over 40 years and most of that time we had little dim flicker lights that pale in comparison to todays modern lights and I have NEVER BEEN HIT from behind.

Most strikes from behind is due to mostly due to drunk drivers or people yakin on cell phone or text messaging of all things. And some policing agencies won't even run their rear flashing lights anymore because drunks are attracted to them like bugs to a light at night. With that known fact your probably more at risk with a brighter flashing light! That's why Europe and some states recommend steady instead of flashing tail lights on bikes.