Originally Posted by
SDRider
What would you call it when a product doesn't work consistently the way you'd expect it to?
What have I said, or have you experienced, to conclude that the SRAM shifters are in any way erratic in their function?
Back in early April you wrote:
Originally Posted by
SDRider
I have a friend who tried the SRAM groupset this season on his Seven (he's CAT1 and sponsored by Seven this season) but he switched back to Dura-Ace because he couldn't get used to the shifting and it was costing him time during races.
"Couldn't get used to" is a far cry from "doesn't work consistently the way you'd expect it to". The first one is personal preference, the second implies an inherent design flaw. Does your friend think that there is a fatal flaw in the SRAM system?