Originally Posted by
VanceMac
Only half is biased? That would give it a huge advantage over the media, gov't, academia, you name it. I find Wiki the most useful starting point on many of my queries.
What I really meant is that its biased on behalf of the ******uses. ANYONE can make a wikipedia page and make changes/additions. Not ANYONE can publish, speak on behalf of the govt, or appear in the media. A published source has had much more scrutiny because the person put much more effort into it.