Originally Posted by madpogue
He didn't say he would have the information if it were true, he said "If we had that information it would be on our Statistics page." (Emphasis mine.) IOW, they don't have information either way as to the risk of head injury while cycling relative to other activities. That's not the same as saying it's not riskier. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
We had several emails back and forth to make sure we both understood each other. If you don't see things the same way, that's fine, it doesn't change things. Believe what you wish.