View Single Post
Old 08-17-07, 12:36 AM
  #86  
wroomwroomoops
Sir Fallalot
 
wroomwroomoops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Perhaps I'm not being clear enough. I am talking about marketing hype. Maybe my sarcasm isn't coming across. I'll try to use some of the smiley faces next time.

If you want a 10% reduction (as your math leads us to believe) perhaps that can be justification for designing a29er specific crankset. The company that has this new wonder crank now has a marketing gimmick that other companies don't have. That new crank will need a new fr der, won't it? If we already have a need for slightly larger rotors, heck, through in a RR der and it's a group.

I'm talking about marketing people - not math.

No, that new "crank" (I believe you meant "crankset", but oh, ok, it's just me being pedantic, I guess) will not need a new front deraileur. Basically, I see you are a bit ignorant when it comes to bike mechanics, and this leads me to believe your original post was not, in fact, sarcastic, but uninformed.

By the way: do you have something against math?
wroomwroomoops is offline