View Single Post
Old 08-17-07, 08:34 PM
  #10  
ericgu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ThrottleJock
Max HR calculation at 220 minus my age has it at 189, but I regularly ride for minutes at a time above 190 and the max I've seen recently is 198, achieved at a 9/10ths effort sprint. I'm pretty sure I can hit 200 if I really rip it, but 198 is a good working number for now. The fixed gear/bullhorn thing would cause me to expend greater energy than if I were on a geared bike with drops and riding in an aerodynamic fashion, that's the only reason I bring it up. The HRM wouldn't know, but my body sure would.

I'm not overly concerned with the HRM anyway. I've always been relatively traditional in my "training" methods and was able to compete at the pro/elite level for years without ever using one. I'm old and decrepit now from various amateur motorcycle racing injuries and racing at an elite level on bicyles or motorcycles is no longer my goal, keeping the beer gut to a reasonable size and girth is. This thing's a fun little toy to occupy me while I spin away the miles.

I was just checking to see if these numbers are an anomoly, which obviously they are. Thanks guys!
People like big numbers on their HR monitors.

Oh, and 220-age is meaningless. Being 10% above or below that isn't uncommon and all, and I've known people whose max was 20% above that.
__________________
Eric

2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com
ericgu is offline