Originally Posted by
seaneee
^ I don't think there is anything wrong with Dr. D running the idea by the people on this forum, because, yes, it does happen. And sometimes it helps to get viewpoints from others. Besides, forums like this are in place to help other people out with questions and problems.
What I do take issue with are all the responses that automatically assume that the seller is shady without doing any digging or reasoning. Those are the people who should be apologizing.
Well Dr.D more or less "assumed that the ebay seller was shady" in his posts, but that didn't stop Dr. D. from dickering a new lower price, now did it? Wouldn't it have been better for Dr. D. to have waited until he was done "brokering a new deal" to tell us if the seller was shady or not?
I agree with you that some other posters should apologize for assuming that the ebay seller was shady!