View Single Post
Old 09-06-07 | 12:21 PM
  #19  
robmcl
Prairie Path Commuter
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Forest Park, IL

Bikes: Marin Palisades Trail

Originally Posted by badger1
Taking your question head on, that is assuming a 'hybrid/mtb' riding position,and assuming that you equalize the gearing, roughly same speed for the same effort. One of the best discussions of this I've seen is by Andy Blance on the Thorn (UK) website: yes, 700c has a slight advantage in rolling resistance over 'bumps' BUT 26" with, say, wider 1.5 tires at lower pressure have less rolling resistance over ever-present small road surface imperfections -- probably pretty much balances out. 700c 'wins' at sustained, 'racing' speeds due to aerodynamic advantages and other factors (e.g. narrow tires at high pressures), 26" at more usual touring/fast touring speeds due to comfort (wider tire, lower pressure), relative wheel strength, and (importantly) ability to accelerate slightly more quickly. As others have said, figure out your priorities, best fit, and choose accordingly.
+1
I was going to mention Thorn myself. When I looked into this I came to the conclusion that the most meaningful difference is the bigger selection of slick, skinning tires available in the 700c size. I don’t think the speed difference would be realized unless you are a very fit athlete in a time trial.
robmcl is offline  
Reply