Thread: back pack?
View Single Post
Old 07-05-04, 08:49 AM
  #6  
MudPie
Senior Member
 
MudPie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by DMulyava
I reccomend the Camelbak M.U.L.E for your mountain biking needs. It's kind of expensive, but well worth it!
I completely agree. The MULE holds 100 oz of fluid, and has 3 zippered compartments plus a vented external "stuff" compartment. It also has creature comforts like chest and waist straps, key clip, internal pockets. All in a fairly compact design that hugs your back. I bought one of these earlier this year and I'll never go back to fumbling for bottles.

The MULE seems to be the best size. Not too big, not too small. Perfect for a half-day ride.

Also the beauty of such packs is it keeps your bike looking clean. No more noise from water bottles and tools rattling in seat bags.

I also agree that it's a bit expensive, $80 MSRP. I noticed Universal Cycles in Portland Oregon sells them for like $59 and Oregon does not collect sales tax.

If you think the MULE is expensive, just wait until you see the price of all the cleaning accessories available!
MudPie is offline