What if what I wear, is the shorts, would everything worn on top be overwear?
I mean, underwear is worn because people feel they have to have it for functional reasons, and thus it's beleived by many to be a means to the ends that is outerwear. However, if the streetclothes/ outerwear was the part considered manditory for function and the clothing worn underneath was the actual prefered clothing, shouldn't the outerwear be looked down upon the way underwear normaly is?
Think of it this way; If you put a coat on over a fancy set of duds, do the duds then become underwear while the coat becomes the duds, or is the coat in the same class that underwear is normally placed and has little affect on what one considers the main outfit?
Man I'm tired.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Last edited by capsicum; 11-15-06 at 07:54 AM.