Originally Posted by
lvleph
There are so many fallacies in your argument I am having trouble even beginning to refute them. I think you are very uneducated toward the systems you are trying to refute.
Capitalism is a system by which one exploits another. An anarchist does not believe in the exploitation of one person of another. Capitalism is a system of land owners. As stated in my previous post quoting Bakunin, land owner ship leads to exploitation. Capitalism is not necessarily free market.
Hello? We stopped living with the fuedal system for quite some time now. Capitalism is based on ownership of private property, whether real estate or chattels. Freely exchanging goods and services for negotiated prices does not exploit anyone. Land ownership is a quintessential element of freedom. The right to exclude others from my property is essential for men to be truly free.
anarchy by definition results in exploitation. With no government (or leaders--whatever terminology you want to use) there can be no system to enforce property rights. With no property rights the mob can take my property. Since my property was purchased from the fruits of my labor, for which I was compensated monetarily, stealing my property is stealing my labor. As the first and foremost element of a free society is ownership of one's own body, stealing my labor is stealing my life. If a man can loot my property he can just as easily take my life. With no courts, who will enforce contracts? With no police, who will prevent others from physically molestation or theft? Sure, people can hire their own "bodyguards" and establish private courts, but in the end you are left with mob rule and with might makes right.