Old 10-16-07, 12:23 PM
  #10  
n_r_child
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 54

Bikes: Salsa Las Cruces, Novara Strada '05, Redline Monocog 29er, Trek 930, Peugeot Iseran

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joelpalmer
Sounds like (from other posts) it's the rack. I'm 250 and ride with a heavy load on the back rack without any issues on a couple of different bikes (MTB, 3 speed, roadie). The rack itself does make a big difference. That being said, I know there are some builders who argue that a front mounted load is inherently more stable (CETMA and Kogswell come to mind) so I guess it's a matter of opinion.
But aren't those inherently stable racks mounted to the frame, and NOT the fork? I foresee all sorts of stability issues while turning under load if the rack is mounted to the fork.
n_r_child is offline