I mean simple because it's doesn't add to the number of moving parts, like a chain tensioner would.
You quote 'adjustable length shock replacement' like I said 'nuclear fission propulsion device', it may seem like an insurmountable technical problem to you but, believe me, it's not rocket science.
Originally Posted by
schnee
So, an existing, tried, true $40 solution is less simple than an 'adjustable length shock replacement' that has yet to exist and you'll come up with on your own? I like your world. Can I have some pie?