Originally Posted by
chevy42083
I actually see what he means... and it kinda makes sense.
Say a chain lasts 1000k miles. A cassette lasts longer.
When the chain stretches out and wears, you'll end up putting a brand new chain on a worn cassette at the 1000k mi. mark.
However, if you swapped chains every so often, then you'd get 2000k miles before needing a "new" chain... which by then the cassette could be replaced without replacing it prematurely. Basically, you'd be getting a brand new cassette at the same time as a brand new chain at the 2000k mark.
Atleast that's the logic I can pull from the idea... I have no idea if it works in practice... and the numbers were fictional.... and I tend to neglect my drivetrain anyways.
I believe you need to study the economics of this idea. Why use $150 worth of chains to protect a $70 cassette?
If you use Campy Record Ti cassettes at $300 each, maybe changing chains at 1000K (or 1000 mile) intervals makes sense (cents?). Otherwise it's a waste of money.