Originally Posted by
Allister
I don't think any court will ever require anyone to ride a bike. They only stop them from driving a car. If they take to using a bike, that only shows an ability to find a reasonable alternative to driving, and is much more preferable than them flouting the court order, and driving anyway, which happens disturbingly often. They may even keep cycling when they get their license back. It's all good.
I'm not trying to start an argument, but calling ol' Rodney a cyclist is a stretch. The only reason Rodney is on a bike is because he smashed 3 Escalades into utility poles in less than a month, and the judge told him he was going to throw his ass in jail if he did it one more time. Otherwise Rodney would be riding in his Escalade.