View Single Post
Old 12-07-07 | 01:47 PM
  #97  
X-LinkedRider's Avatar
X-LinkedRider
Flying Under the Radar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
From: Northeast PA

Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc

Originally Posted by SSP
Words are useful to communication because they have generally accepted meanings.

While those meanings can change over time, the commonly accepted definition for "gay" is "*****exual".

If you wish to continue to write in a style that sounds ignorant, well, it's a free country.

And you're the one who has problems with form-fitting, cycling-specific clothing...my self-esteem is just fine.
Being that I own lycra and underarmor and wear them both, but prefer UA as a product. Where you got this idea that I dislike form-fitting clothing is funny to me. I was simply agreeing with what CMY said about people wearing it just to look the part. You really need to read a little more before defending the products you wear as though somebody is attacking them. The reason I don't wear my lycra is that is I just find my UA to be much better in every way. That's all. If you would like for me to take a picture of my wardrobe to show that I don't mind form-fitting clothes. That can easily be done. But I am sure you would find something wrong with the way I fold my clothes or hang stuff up in my closet.

I live in the mountains and for me staying warm is key. Just because I mentioned that it is OK to Layer with under armor doesn't mean I dislike my body. It just means I am not too "Gay" about having to wear a single layer in below 20 degrees, as I would with lycra.
X-LinkedRider is offline  
Reply