Yeah, of course he didn't say any of that. I'm just inferring from post content as to the original intent of all that's been said thus far. My mistake.

Anyway, let's ignore the fact that putting a glass bowl, or whatever, over a tennis ball so that a dog becomes confused is cruelty towards animals. I don't see it that way, I'm pretty sure the OP doesn't see it that way, but the two of you do. That's fine.

However, to assert that the OP, for the virtue of practicing said behavior, ought to get hit by a car, and then backed-over, is stupid.

I know you're just trying to flame, but whatever, that's usually what I do too.