Originally Posted by
operator
No, but realisticly you're a ****ing ****** if you try to place the blame on a taxi that hit you WHILE you were running a red light. Semantics, nitpicking law aside.
um, yeah--right.
Actually, if the cyclist was (hypothetically) 60% at fault and
taxi driver was 40% at fault for driving like a maniac--and he
suffered no damage but her bike was trashed how would it
be unfair for her to recover 40% of the cost of a replacement--
oh wait, this is bfssfg where reason has been suspended--
never mind.