Originally Posted by
kaiju-velo
um, yeah--right.
Actually, if the cyclist was (hypothetically) 60% at fault and
taxi driver was 40% at fault for driving like a maniac--and he
suffered no damage but her bike was trashed how would it
be unfair for her to recover 40% of the cost of a replacement--
oh wait, this is bfssfg where reason has been suspended--
never mind.
I got a fender bender with a car a long time ago. I was making a U-turn and didn't see a car behind me until it was too late. The cop said the car could have been going 100 miles per hour and it still would have been my fault since he had the right of way. Percentages of fault won't matter.