Originally Posted by
Negative Force
Ready? You don't know what you're talking about. And I'm not going to labor the point past this post, but first of all of course Trek is going to sell a relatively casual bike such as this to people who may think these bikes are uncomfortable.
That's because, again, he target market here is not ******bags on the internet who think they can tell the difference in ride between a couple degrees in seat tube angles, but don't realize things like that comfort bikes have 26 inch wheels rather than 700c... for instance.
And no, the geometry is not similar between these two bikes. Understandably, you're making that mistake because they... both have two wheels and are photographed from the side.
The component setup is fundamentally different as well. To see these differences, take for example the seat tube angle, the type of saddle--which accommodates a different rider position, the wheel and the tire size, the suspension fork on the comfort bike, the type of brakes, the head tube angle and the saddle-to-handlebar height difference.
This is not a subject I'm very interested in so I'm not going to keep bothering with it, but it is always entertaining to see the way people guess at something and then try to back up their points on this forum.
I didn't say they were exact, I said SIMILAR. The sloping top tube, the nearly vertical riser, the low seat tube. If you lined them up along with a proper road or track bike, which one wouldn't belong? As to what category the bike belongs in... THE STATEMENT ON TREKs WEBSITE THAT INFORMS THE SOHO S IS DESIGNED FOR COMFORT most definitely puts it in that category.
Enjoy your Soho I'm sure it's a very nice bike. IMO it would be nicer as a three speed.
BTW, this statement is false...
"comfort bikes have 26 inch wheels rather than 700c."
Rider position and gearing dictate comfort - not wheel size.