View Single Post
Old 02-02-08, 11:50 AM
  #17  
matthew_deaner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Spencer, IN
Posts: 689

Bikes: Trek 5200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by badger1
Well, I use discs and really don't want to switch back to rim brakes, for all the reasons given above. However, seems to me it's not "all gain, no loss". With f/r discs, you inherently have much more dishing both front and rear, in addition to rear drive-side dish if running a cassette. Thus, wheels are inherently quite a bit weaker -- no way around this. I don't worry much, running 26" (559 rims) wheels, but I would think a bit more of an issue with 700c?? Dunno, but intuitively strikes me as a consideration. I also second the comment about fork rigidity and ride quality; any rigid 700c bikes running discs that I'm familiar with do seem to have to have an overbuilt fork, to cope with the braking forces, relative to a version with rim brakes. Compare, e.g., a Trek Soho/disc with, e.g., a Trek fx bike, which uses v-brakes.
This is a good post... a really balenced point of view. I would like to add that rim replacement need not be more expensive than disc replacement, if you can build your own wheels.

But honestly, despite their drawbacks, I would love to have a disc brake equipped bike to use on rain days or in snowy weather. I'm buying an IRO Rob Roy frame as a part of the BF group buy. My plan is to get a Surly disc fork and run a front avid disc, and keep the rear wheel brakeless (as a fixed gear).
matthew_deaner is offline