View Single Post
Old 02-06-08 | 03:04 AM
  #10  
tasr's Avatar
tasr
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA

Bikes: 2010 Felt B12 w/Shimano Ultegra and ZIPP 808’s, 2007 Scott CR1 Equipe w/Campagnolo Chorus, 2010 Fuji Cross Comp w/Shimano 105/Ultegra, 1991 Kestral 200SC w/Shimano Ultegra

Originally Posted by johanfl
Two things about that frame.
The gap between the rear wheel and seattube is too big, and size is determed by lenght of toptube only.
The seat tube lenght is always 545mm regardless of size. I don't know if that is a negative thing.
You can find a pic of built up frame here: http://happymtb.org/forum/read.php/1/789729



If this is this picture you’re referring to. I don't think this it’s the same frame. Look at the down tube. There also doesn't seem to be the upward angle at the end of the chain stays at the drops. Although I think it could just be the angles of the pictures them selves.


Originally Posted by Bike enthusiast
The weidest part of the frame is the chain stay dropouts.... Why does it go up at the rear? Are they trying to lower the center of gravity?
Shorten the wheel base, lower center of gravity and stiffer.

I like it. Where did you find it?
__________________
James
tasr is offline  
Reply