View Single Post
Old 02-11-08 | 07:04 AM
  #13  
derath
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Reisterstown, MD
Originally Posted by patentcad
As a Power Tap owner who thinks the PT actually works, I do fail to see the real need for PM's that install in BBs, are limited to one bicycle, and run in the $3K range. For most amateur racers, the PT works. Worked for Floyd Landis too (he had a PT on his bike during his now infamous Tour de France failed doping test breakaway performance). I get the advantages, but to me they seem offset by the high price and the disadvantages. To each his own.

At a minimum I'd suggest a PT as a first PM, with an SRM or Quarq later.
I guess you can have arguments on both sides. A PT is easily transferrable to multiple bike. A crank based PM makes it easy to switch between a training set of wheels and race day wheels. I mean if you have to choose between a nice carbon tubular race wheel or your clincher set to mount the PT on, which do you go with?

-D
derath is offline  
Reply