View Single Post
Old 02-15-08 | 06:58 AM
  #16  
mustang1's Avatar
mustang1
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,719
Likes: 4
From: London, UK

Bikes: 2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail

Originally Posted by CrossChain
Other factors being equal, what noticable performance/handling differences, if any, would there be between a conventional frame-- which I know and whose appearance I prefer-- and its compact cousin?
I always thought a smaller triangle is sturdier/stiffer/stronger than a larger triangle. If we forget compact v regualr frames for a sec and compare 2 regular frames, one 50cm, one 58cm, I would say the smaller one is stiffer.

Now we can apply this analogy to a compact frame, a 58cm compact frame and 58cm regular frame, I'd say the smaller triangle (compact frame) is stronger.

As an aside, I too prefer the look of a regular frame (see my post "My ugly Allez" but I'm now getting more accustomed to compact frame designs.
mustang1 is offline  
Reply