Originally Posted by
Bekologist
same conclusion here as well, script.
john disengenously and sophistically frames a lot of arguments with his 'childish cycling' beratement.
Given that you had the "same (wrong) conclusion" about what he meant, that means you don't understand what he wrote. Thus, you have no basis to judge what he writes as being disingenuous, sophistic framing, or anything else, because you obviously are not making the effort to comprehend what he's writing, much less judge it.