Originally Posted by
KidTruth
How is 20 people in a row screaming at you that helmets are beneficial, everywhere you go... how is that not evidence? I think you've got a lot of evidence screaming in your face about what situations a helmet is useful in and exactly how they are useful..
Did these same 20 people have the same crash withOUT the helmet? How do they know the helmet helped exactly? Because it was broken?
Originally Posted by
KidTruth
A study like this is extremely hard to do. I'd guess that the safest way would be to look at cycling helmet statistics in an area in america right before and right after a mandatory cycling helmet law goes into place.
If those numbers still contradict me, we can talk.
If you actually read the links, you would see that is the type data being pointed to.