Thread: Why Lugs?
View Single Post
Old 03-04-08 | 09:54 AM
  #17  
Picchio Special
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,045
Likes: 15
From: Lancaster County, PA

Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis

Originally Posted by sced
It's purely a matter of aesthetics. The pros done use either any more.
This statement confuses a couple of different issues. Whether or not lugs are purely an aesthetic choice is one question. However, the second sentence doesn't follow from the first one. An important question to ask is whether or not what pros use is what makes sense for the average rider. Pros get new bikes every year. They usually don't even choose those themselves. For them, a few grams may be the difference between staying with the lead group on a long climb or dropping off the pace. I'm not sure what pros do or don't use goes straight to the issue of what the average (or below average, or above average) recreational rider needs and would want to ride for, say, 10 years.
That said, I agree that the use of lugs is largely on aesthetic grounds.
Picchio Special is offline  
Reply