Originally Posted by
caloso
A couple of things to consider: it may be possible (preferable?) to find a longer and calmer route. And you might find using the 2100 to work as well or better than the Navigator. Especially if you're training for a tri, you might find it the most efficient use of your time to combine your commute and training. (That's exactly how I got hooked on commuting.)
I just throw it out there for consideration: only you can determine what works best for your situation. And welcome to the other side!
I have considered using the 2100 to commute, but I have a few concerns with that idea. The first being...the bike is way more expensive than my Nav and I don't feel comfortable locking it up on the bike rack at work. I work at a college in a not-so-great neighborhood...hence the reason for wanting to use the cheaper Nav. There have also been many attempted bike thefts at my gym...(clientele not the greatest)...so that has me concerned, as well. I realize that $1,200 for a bike may be just a drop in the bucket for some folks, but for me...it's the most expensive bike I have ever purchased in my entire life. The other reason for not wanting to use the 2100 is that I need to be able to wear regular street shoes when riding to work (don't want to carry a pair with me)...and the 2100 has clipless SPD pedals. It's just less for me to worry about and carry with me. Perhaps not the best reason, but oh well.
In regards to the "calmer route"...yes, I have already mapped out several different options that would work for me. Might add more time on to the commute, but probably a lot less dangerous. The downside to that is...the alternate, "calmer" routes aren't as well-lit as the more direct route.
Linda