Originally Posted by
Psimet2001
FWIW - every single one of my culmulative numbers from the Garmin 305 has been low by 20%-60%.
I think their "on board" vertical accumulator algorithm must be pretty crude. But by the time the raw data gets read by and analyzed by Ascent, the numbers I've been getting are dead on.
I can't say enough good things about Ascent. I requested a VAM (rate of ascent) feature, and it was added to the next minor upgrade a few weeks later.