View Single Post
Old 03-26-08 | 11:28 AM
  #24  
mander
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
Originally Posted by conor
just keep in mind that if you're going to have horizontal dropouts, you won't be able to take it on the track.
Do you know this for a fact? Is it in UCI regulations or something? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious. At my old local drome (Burnaby), road conversions weren't allowed but the reason they always gave was that the bbs are too low for the banking. Naturally this doesnt have to be a problem on a custom roadfix frame.

Originally Posted by wearyourtruth
i personally love both. i would go with the indi fab though, because i really just don't want to see that de rosa built up as a "conversion," no matter how nice. the frame deserves better and frankly, if i'm gonna drop the kind of money i think you will, my bike isn't going to have shifter bosses and derailler hangers
Wearyourtruth I see where you're coming from but it still seems absurd. You say that a custom high end road frame deserves better than to be run as a fg, and then in the same sentence you imply that a custom high end road frame is not good enough to run as a fg. I guess it has to do with personal preference but I really do like the old British path racer aesthetic for its built in flexibility.

Sorry bonzo for the OT.

Last edited by mander; 03-26-08 at 12:02 PM.
mander is offline  
Reply