View Single Post
Old 04-05-08 | 02:25 PM
  #46  
ChipSeal's Avatar
ChipSeal
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: South of Dallas, Texas

Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road

Originally Posted by mike
I wish this were true. I have heard this, read it, and tried it. The fact is that if you are on a busy road bicycling at 16 mph in a lane where motor vehicles are moving at 45 mph, you are going to get hit eventually.
You see it in the drivers' faces when one driver goes around you and the next car zip up behind you and screech on the brakes. Their eyes are huge and dilated and you can read their lips shouting "OH SHEEEET!!!" as they thank God they didn't just cream the crazy bicyclist.

You can argue from your hospital bed that you had the right to be on the road, just like a motor vehicle and you will be right by the law.

In a world where motorists run into buses , the chance of them running into bicyclists also exists. In order to extend our bicycling days, it is prudent to use common sense.
Wow! I guess I'm lucky to be alive!

If what you claim is true, how do you explain the last 7,000 miles I have traveled on multi-lane arterials? How could I have survived for so long?

How can you explain the fact that the tire smoking scenario you describe has yet to occur to me?

My real world extensive experience is contrary to your assertion. High speed arterial traffic flows around me in an elegant manner with little fuss. This is true in rush hour as well as 2 AM. In my opinion, arterial streets, with narrow right lanes, are safer than residential streets. I have had many times more close calls on those than on arterials. (This is in spite of my vastly greater use of arterials in terms of both time of exposure and distance traveled.)

You are welcome to your views on the matter, but where I ride, your views don't resemble my experience.
ChipSeal is offline  
Reply