View Single Post
Old 04-08-08, 05:53 AM
  #12  
dekindy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It was probably purchased in 2006. I have seen descriptions that conflicted with the summary. It was obvious that the seller bought NOS that was older than advertised. I think it is a case of just not knowing any better.

Heck, I even saw a guy advertising a Waterford as new per the summary and then stated in the description that he had sent it back to Waterford for repaint. You don't send a new bike back for repaint. I called him on it and he referenced his record of hundreds of E-bay sale versus my couple of dozen. I replied back that it did not take any E-bay transactions to determine the bike was not new. He finally said he would change it just for me!

I am very careful on E-bay. But there are some good deals to be had. As long as there are not significant differences between a 2005 & 2006, the bike is in good condition, and you got a good price I would not complain.
dekindy is offline