You just reiterated my point. In your words, "they **** a lot", well we're all guilty of that (thank God). Then the industrialized internal combustion driving United Nations comes in and feeds them. Sounds to me like the western world is enabling all the world's poor people to survive and propogate. I'm not sure what you're getting at with the population density comment. China and India are the most populated countries in the world (I believe). While some folks like to gripe about the fact that the US accounts for only a small percentage of the world population yet consumes most of the world's energy, I would kindly point to your statement above claiming that the UN is keeping the massive poor populations alive. Who do you think foots the majority of the bill for that? (I'll give you a hint, it's not China or India).

Look dude, just because I called you out on your childish troll post doesn't mean that you have to attack me personally. I'm simply stating my opinion. I believe it's foolish to bask in a world full of creature comforts created by industrialization and claim to be anti-industry. I didn't call you crunchy granola or whatever you claimed in your previous post. I don't feel threatened by the fact that you have an opinion. I think your method of stating your opinion is a bit weak and somewhat coloquial.

Although I'm NOT pro-tinfoil hat wearing mewling hypocrit, I am pro-environment. I hunt, fish, backpack, camp, mountain bike, and respect the environment just as much as some boob who rides a bicycle and feels self-riteous enough to say that everyone should give up their cars.

By the way, I don't write with a thesaurus, I'm just that good